Search for: "Foster v. Medical Division" Results 1 - 20 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given these and other considerations – including that the foster parent was a “consistent source of support and love for the child” and was “fully engaged in the child's schooling, medical care, and emotional and intellectual development and committed to fostering an ongoing relationship between the child and his extended family” – the AD1 left the outcome undisturbed.There was no fostering a different result there.#… [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 7:03 am
The NJ Appellate Division recently affirmed a jury award for $200,000. for medical monitoring. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 1:25 am
Baldwin, defendant-appellant APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT Contracts Absent Definite Term, Oral Partnership Pact For Indefinite Period Creates Joint Venture At Will Foster v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Jaiheem M.S. v Sharon H. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Desilets, 418 Mass. 316 (1994), rather than the federal Free Exercise test articulated in Employment Division v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Chandel B. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Appellate Division, First Department Support Magistrate properly imputed income to the father based on cash and in-kind support provided by his family, both prior to and after the filing of the petition In Matter of Nannan L v Stephen L, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 559146 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which denied the father’s petition for a downward modification of his child support obligations. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The First Department looks at the purpose of Judiciary Law § 487 damages in Jean v Chinitz  2018 NY Slip Op 05521 [163 AD3d 497] July 26, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Western Division (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm by Kurt R. Karst
By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —“Total Product Life Cycle Advisory Program or TAP pilot — the most exciting thing in MDUFA V. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:47 am
  The Appellate Division recently addressed these factors in the context of a physical and legal custodial dispute in Elliott v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
Moving forward two decades, Foster Wheeler was able to show that Bethlehem Steel’s Medical Director, Dr. [read post]